dnsforward: allowed clients local
This commit is contained in:
@@ -30,6 +30,9 @@ NOTE: Add new changes BELOW THIS COMMENT.
|
||||
|
||||
### Fixed
|
||||
|
||||
- Locally served address are now ignored from allowed/blocked clients access
|
||||
lists. These addresses are always allowed ([#5799]).
|
||||
|
||||
- Unquoted IPv6 bind hosts with trailing colons erroneously considered
|
||||
unspecified addresses are now properly validated ([#5752]).
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -42,6 +45,7 @@ NOTE: Add new changes BELOW THIS COMMENT.
|
||||
|
||||
[#1577]: https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/issues/1577
|
||||
[#5716]: https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/issues/5716
|
||||
[#5799]: https://github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/issues/5799
|
||||
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
NOTE: Add new changes ABOVE THIS COMMENT.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ import (
|
||||
"github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/internal/aghalg"
|
||||
"github.com/AdguardTeam/AdGuardHome/internal/aghhttp"
|
||||
"github.com/AdguardTeam/golibs/log"
|
||||
"github.com/AdguardTeam/golibs/netutil"
|
||||
"github.com/AdguardTeam/golibs/stringutil"
|
||||
"github.com/AdguardTeam/urlfilter"
|
||||
"github.com/AdguardTeam/urlfilter/filterlist"
|
||||
@@ -138,9 +139,13 @@ func (a *accessManager) isBlockedHost(host string, qt rules.RRType) (ok bool) {
|
||||
return ok
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// isBlockedIP returns the status of the IP address blocking as well as the rule
|
||||
// that blocked it.
|
||||
// isBlockedIP returns the status of the IP address blocking as well as the
|
||||
// rule that blocked it. Locally served addresses are always allowed.
|
||||
func (a *accessManager) isBlockedIP(ip netip.Addr) (blocked bool, rule string) {
|
||||
if netutil.IsLocallyServedAddr(ip) {
|
||||
return false, ""
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
blocked = true
|
||||
ips := a.blockedIPs
|
||||
ipnets := a.blockedNets
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ func TestIsBlockedHost(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestIsBlockedIP(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
func TestAccessManager_IsBlockedIP_allow(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
clients := []string{
|
||||
"1.2.3.4",
|
||||
"5.6.7.8/24",
|
||||
@@ -112,49 +112,93 @@ func TestIsBlockedIP(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
allowCtx, err := newAccessCtx(clients, nil, nil)
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
||||
testCases := []struct {
|
||||
ip netip.Addr
|
||||
want assert.BoolAssertionFunc
|
||||
name string
|
||||
wantRule string
|
||||
}{{
|
||||
ip: netip.MustParseAddr("1.2.3.4"),
|
||||
name: "match_ip",
|
||||
wantRule: "1.2.3.4",
|
||||
want: assert.False,
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
ip: netip.MustParseAddr("5.6.7.100"),
|
||||
name: "match_cidr",
|
||||
wantRule: "5.6.7.8/24",
|
||||
want: assert.False,
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
ip: netip.MustParseAddr("9.2.3.4"),
|
||||
name: "no_match_ip",
|
||||
wantRule: "",
|
||||
want: assert.True,
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
ip: netip.MustParseAddr("9.6.7.100"),
|
||||
name: "no_match_cidr",
|
||||
wantRule: "",
|
||||
want: assert.True,
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
ip: netip.MustParseAddr("127.0.0.1"),
|
||||
name: "locally_served_ip",
|
||||
wantRule: "",
|
||||
want: assert.False,
|
||||
}}
|
||||
|
||||
for _, tc := range testCases {
|
||||
t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
blocked, rule := allowCtx.isBlockedIP(tc.ip)
|
||||
tc.want(t, blocked)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, tc.wantRule, rule)
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
func TestAccessManager_IsBlockedIP_block(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
clients := []string{
|
||||
"1.2.3.4",
|
||||
"5.6.7.8/24",
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
blockCtx, err := newAccessCtx(nil, clients, nil)
|
||||
require.NoError(t, err)
|
||||
|
||||
testCases := []struct {
|
||||
ip netip.Addr
|
||||
name string
|
||||
wantRule string
|
||||
wantBlocked bool
|
||||
ip netip.Addr
|
||||
want assert.BoolAssertionFunc
|
||||
name string
|
||||
wantRule string
|
||||
}{{
|
||||
ip: netip.MustParseAddr("1.2.3.4"),
|
||||
name: "match_ip",
|
||||
wantRule: "1.2.3.4",
|
||||
wantBlocked: true,
|
||||
ip: netip.MustParseAddr("1.2.3.4"),
|
||||
name: "match_ip",
|
||||
wantRule: "1.2.3.4",
|
||||
want: assert.True,
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
ip: netip.MustParseAddr("5.6.7.100"),
|
||||
name: "match_cidr",
|
||||
wantRule: "5.6.7.8/24",
|
||||
wantBlocked: true,
|
||||
ip: netip.MustParseAddr("5.6.7.100"),
|
||||
name: "match_cidr",
|
||||
wantRule: "5.6.7.8/24",
|
||||
want: assert.True,
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
ip: netip.MustParseAddr("9.2.3.4"),
|
||||
name: "no_match_ip",
|
||||
wantRule: "",
|
||||
wantBlocked: false,
|
||||
ip: netip.MustParseAddr("9.2.3.4"),
|
||||
name: "no_match_ip",
|
||||
wantRule: "",
|
||||
want: assert.False,
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
ip: netip.MustParseAddr("9.6.7.100"),
|
||||
name: "no_match_cidr",
|
||||
wantRule: "",
|
||||
wantBlocked: false,
|
||||
ip: netip.MustParseAddr("9.6.7.100"),
|
||||
name: "no_match_cidr",
|
||||
wantRule: "",
|
||||
want: assert.False,
|
||||
}, {
|
||||
ip: netip.MustParseAddr("127.0.0.1"),
|
||||
name: "locally_served_ip",
|
||||
wantRule: "",
|
||||
want: assert.False,
|
||||
}}
|
||||
|
||||
t.Run("allow", func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
for _, tc := range testCases {
|
||||
blocked, rule := allowCtx.isBlockedIP(tc.ip)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, !tc.wantBlocked, blocked)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, tc.wantRule, rule)
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
t.Run("block", func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
for _, tc := range testCases {
|
||||
for _, tc := range testCases {
|
||||
t.Run(tc.name, func(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
blocked, rule := blockCtx.isBlockedIP(tc.ip)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, tc.wantBlocked, blocked)
|
||||
tc.want(t, blocked)
|
||||
assert.Equal(t, tc.wantRule, rule)
|
||||
}
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -700,10 +700,12 @@ func (s *Server) IsBlockedClient(ip netip.Addr, clientID string) (blocked bool,
|
||||
blockedByIP := false
|
||||
if ip != (netip.Addr{}) {
|
||||
blockedByIP, rule = s.access.isBlockedIP(ip)
|
||||
log.Debug("by ip %v", blockedByIP)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
allowlistMode := s.access.allowlistMode()
|
||||
blockedByClientID := s.access.isBlockedClientID(clientID)
|
||||
log.Debug("by client id %v", blockedByClientID)
|
||||
|
||||
// Allow if at least one of the checks allows in allowlist mode, but block
|
||||
// if at least one of the checks blocks in blocklist mode.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user